Journal
NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages 477-489Publisher
SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43017-021-00173-9
Keywords
-
Funding
- National Science Foundation [2020305]
- Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant KMI [2018-01011]
- NSF [AGS-1543932, AGS-1652289]
- Directorate For Geosciences
- Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [2020305] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) and the tropospheric Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) are strongly linked in boreal winter. Observations show that MJO is stronger and longer-lasting during winters with easterly QBO winds. Despite the global impacts of the QBO-MJO connection, the mechanisms driving this link remain uncertain. Most numerical models are unable to reproduce the observed QBO-MJO relationship, indicating biases or deficiencies in the models' representation of key physical processes. Further research is needed to establish a working mechanism and improve model simulations of the QBO-MJO connection.
The stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) and the tropospheric Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) are strongly linked in boreal winter. In this Review, we synthesize observational and modelling evidence for this QBO-MJO connection and discuss its effects on MJO teleconnections and subseasonal-to-seasonal predictions. After 1980, observations indicate that, during winters when lower-stratospheric QBO winds are easterly, the MJO is similar to 40% stronger and persists roughly 10 days longer compared with when QBO winds are westerly. Global subseasonal forecast models, in turn, show a 1-week improvement (or 25% enhancement) in MJO prediction skill in QBO easterly versus QBO westerly phases. Despite the robustness of the observed QBO-MJO link and its global impacts via atmospheric teleconnections, the mechanisms that drive the connection are uncertain. Theories largely centre on QBO-related temperature stratification effects and subsequent impacts on deep convection, although other hypotheses propose that cloud radiative effects or QBO impacts on wave propagation might be important. Most numerical models, however, are unable to reproduce the observed QBO-MJO relationship, suggesting biases, deficiencies or omission of key physical processes in the models. While future work must strive to better understand all aspects of the QBO-MJO link, focus is needed on establishing a working mechanism and capturing the connection in models.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available