4.4 Article

Grapevine rootstocks affect growth-related scion phenotypes

Journal

PLANT DIRECT
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/pld3.324

Keywords

grafting; grapevines; root-shoot interactions; rootstocks

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1546869]
  2. Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1546869] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rootstocks play a crucial role in grape cultivation, impacting vine growth performance and yield. The study demonstrates that selecting the right rootstock can increase yield and other growth-related traits by over 50%, highlighting the importance of rootstock choice for grape growers looking to enhance vine performance.
Grape growers use rootstocks to provide protection against pests and pathogens and to modulate viticulture performance such as shoot growth. Our study examined two grapevine scion varieties ('Chardonnay' and 'Cabernet Sauvignon') grafted to 15 different rootstocks and determined the effect of rootstocks on eight traits important to viticulture. We assessed the vines across five years and identified both year and variety as contributing strongly to trait variation. The effect of rootstock was relatively consistent across years and varieties, explaining between 8.99% and 9.78% of the variation in growth-related traits including yield, pruning weight, berry weight and Ravaz index (yield to pruning weight ratio). Increases in yield due to rootstock were generally the result of increases in berry weight, likely due to increased water uptake by vines grafted to a particular rootstock. We demonstrated a greater than 50% increase in yield, pruning weight, or Ravaz index by choosing the optimal rootstock, indicating that rootstock choice is crucial for grape growers looking to improve vine performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available