4.1 Article

The role of organizational learning and resilience for change in building quality improvement capacity in primary care

Journal

HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages E1-E7

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000281

Keywords

organizational learning; practice transformation; primary care; quality improvement

Funding

  1. Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Advanced Physician Fellowship
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R18HS023908]
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1 TR002319]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found a significant positive association between practice adaptive reserve (AR) and quality improvement (QI) capacity, suggesting that AR may be a precondition to growth in QI capacity.
Background The extent that organizational learning and resilience for the change process, that is, adaptive reserve (AR), is a component of building practice capacity for continuous quality improvement (QI) is unknown. Purpose The aim of the study was to examine the association of AR and development of QI capacity. Methodology One hundred forty-two primary care practices were evaluated at baseline and 12 months in a randomized trial to improve care quality. Practice AR was measured by staff survey along with a validated QI capacity assessment (QICA). We assessed the association of baseline QICA with baseline AR and both baseline and change in AR with change in QICA from 0 to 12 months. Effect modification by presence of QI infrastructure in parent organizations and trial arm was examined. Results Mean QICA increased from 6.5 to 8.1 (p < .001), and mean AR increased from 71.8 to 73.9 points (p < .001). At baseline, there was a significant association between AR and QICA scores: The QICA averaged 0.34 points higher (95% CI [0.04, 0.64], p = .03) per 10-point difference in AR. There was a significant association between baseline AR and 12-month QICA-which averaged 0.30 points higher (95% CI [0.02, 0.57], p = .04) per 10 points in baseline AR. There was no association between changes in AR and the QICA from 0 to 12 months and no effect modification by trial arm or external QI infrastructure. Conclusions Baseline AR was positively associated with both baseline and follow-up QI capacity, but there was no association between change in AR and change in the QICA, suggesting AR may be a precondition to growth in QI capacity. Practice Implications Findings suggest that developing AR may be a valuable step prior to undertaking QI-oriented growth, with implications for sequencing of development strategies, including added gain in QI capacity development from building AR prior to engaging in transformation efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available