4.6 Article

Risk factors associated with medication ordering errors

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa264

Keywords

medication ordering errors; medication voiding; CPOE; human factors; SEIPS

Funding

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R21HS025443]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By utilizing a computerized order entry system-integrated function named void, the study aimed to identify the nature and characteristics of medication ordering errors, investigate associated risk factors, and explore strategies to mitigate these risks. Results showed that medication ordering errors were multifactorial and mostly did not result in harm to patients.
Objective: We utilized a computerized order entry system-integrated function referred to as void to identify erroneous orders (ie, a void order). Using voided orders, we aimed to (1) identify the nature and characteristics of medication ordering errors, (2) investigate the risk factors associated with medication ordering errors, and (3) explore potential strategies to mitigate these risk factors. Materials and Methods: We collected data on voided orders using clinician interviews and surveys within 24 hours of the voided order and using chart reviews. Interviews were informed by the human factors-based SEIPS (Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety) model to characterize the work systems-based risk factors contributing to ordering errors; chart reviews were used to establish whether a voided order was a true medication ordering error and ascertain its impact on patient safety. Results: During the 16-month study period (August 25, 2017, to December 31, 2018), 1074 medication orders were voided; 842 voided orders were true medication errors (positive predictive value =78.3 +/- 1.2%). A total of 22% (n=190) of the medication ordering errors reached the patient, with at least a single administration, without causing patient harm. Interviews were conducted on 355 voided orders (33% response). Errors were not uniquely associated with a single risk factor, but the causal contributors of medication ordering errors were multifactorial, arising from a combination of technological-, cognitive-, environmental-, social-, and organizational-level factors. Conclusions: The void function offers a practical, standardized method to create a rich database of medication ordering errors. We highlight implications for utilizing the void function for future research, practice and learning opportunities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available