4.8 Review

Engineering chemical communication between micro/nanosystems

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 50, Issue 16, Pages 8829-8856

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cs01048k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Government (MCUI/FEDER, EU) [RTI2018-100910-B-C41, RTI2018-101599-B-C22]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO 2018/024]
  3. European Union [847675]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemical communication, using molecules as messengers, facilitates information sharing and cooperation between different entities. Recent advances in nanotechnology and synthetic biology have led to the emergence of chemical communication between micro/nanosystems, opening up new possibilities in various research fields.
Chemical communication, based on the exchange of molecules as messengers, allows different entities to share information, cooperate and orchestrate collective behaviors. In recent years, the development of strategies of chemical communication between micro/nanosystems is becoming a key emergent topic in micro/nanotechnology, biomimicry and related areas. In this tutorial review, we provide a general perspective of the concepts used on the topic of chemical communication, and the advances made using different approaches that include nanomaterials, synthetic biology and information-processing tools. Although studies in this direction are very recent, they can be divided in two main categories: (i) communication between abiotic systems and (ii) communication between living and abiotic systems. Using illustrative examples, we give an overview of the ongoing progress, potential applications in different areas and current challenges. The engineering of chemical communication between micro/nanosystems represents a paradigm shift and may open a myriad of new concepts, applications and new technological possibilities in the near future in a number of research fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available