4.6 Article

Formation of self-assembled Gd2O3 nanowire-like structures during epitaxial growth on Si(001)

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 11, Issue 29, Pages 17526-17536

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra00476j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Minna-James-Heineman foundation
  2. Leibniz Universitat Hannover

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structural and morphological properties of gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3) grown at high temperatures with molecular beam epitaxy on Si(001) were investigated for different stages of growth. The results suggest that the nanowire-like structures on Si(001) substrates have specific orientations, and the density and length can be tuned by changing the oxygen partial pressure.
The structural and morphological properties of gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3) grown at high temperatures with molecular beam epitaxy on Si(001) were investigated for different stages of growth. The Gd2O3 layers were grown at 850 degrees C with different oxygen partial pressures and substrate miscuts. RHEED and XRD investigations indicate an initial formation of silicide and a subsequent transformation into cubic Gd2O3 with (110) orientation. The surface exhibits nanowire-like structures oriented orthogonally along with the [110] directions of the substrate, as indicated by AFM. Since on 4 degrees off-cut Si(001) substrates the nanowire-like structures are mainly oriented in only one [110] direction, the orientation of the formed Gd2O3 structures seems to be related to the dimer orientation of the (2 x 1) reconstructed Si(001) surface. The density and length of the nanowire-like structures can be tuned by a change in oxygen partial pressure. The results were discussed in terms of different physical effects, where a combination of desorption of silicon and the formation of a silicide layer in the initial stage of growth could be the reason for the growth behaviour, which is also supported through TEM investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available