4.5 Article

Probing the ΔU=0 rule in three body charm decays

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2021)179

Keywords

CP violation; Heavy Quark Physics

Funding

  1. Israeli council for higher education postdoctoral fellowship for women in science
  2. NSF [PHY1316222]
  3. Stephen Hawking Fellowship from UKRI [EP/T01623X/1]
  4. ISF [2871/19, 2476/17]
  5. GIF [I-67-303.7-2015]
  6. BSF [2016113]
  7. MOST (Israel) [3-16543]
  8. European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skodowska-Curie grant [822070]
  9. EPSRC [EP/T01623X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CP violation in charm decay was observed in D-0 meson decaying to two pseudoscalars, with implications for relevant rescattering amplitudes. Different approaches to probe similar ratios in D-0 decays were discussed, including the advantage of three-body decays over two-body decays. Specific examples of D-0 decays were considered using a toy model of charged resonances.
CP violation in charm decay was observed in the decays D-0 -> (PP -/+)-P-+/- of a D-0 meson to two pseudoscalars. When interpreted within the SM, the results imply that the ratio of the relevant rescattering amplitudes has a magnitude and phase that are both of O(1). We discuss ways to probe similar ratios in D-0 -> (VP -/+)-P-+/- decays, where V is a vector that decays to two pseudoscalars, from the Dalitz-plot analysis of time-integrated three-body decays. Compared to two-body decays, three-body decays have the advantage that the complete system can be solved without the need for time-dependent CP violation measurements or use of correlated D-0-(D) over bar (0) production. We discuss the decays D-0 -> pi(+)pi(-)pi(0) and D-0 -> K+K-pi(0) as examples by considering a toy model of only two overlapping charged resonances, treating the underlying pseudo two-body decays in full generality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available