4.6 Article

Hydrogenated or oxyfunctionalized turpentine: options for automotive fuel components

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 11, Issue 30, Pages 18342-18350

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra03003e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (Project FUELCAM) [SBPLY/17/180501/000299]
  2. University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM) [2019-PREDUCLM-10887]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When selecting feedstock for advanced biofuels, various factors such as economic, technical, social, and ethical aspects need to be taken into consideration. Turpentine and its derivatives have shown potential for diesel blends, with hydroturpentine improving cold flow properties and oxyturpentine reducing sooting tendency.
Many concerns, such as economic and technical viability and social and ethical aspects, must be considered for a feedstock selection for advanced biofuels. Industrialized countries promote the use of industrial waste or by-products for this purpose. In particular, turpentine has several properties which make it an attractive source for biofuels, including its possible industrial waste origin. Nevertheless, turpentine has shown some disadvantages when blended directly with diesel, especially because it increases the sooting tendency. On the contrary, some derivatives of turpentine can be suitable for diesel blends. Thus, the evaluation of their properties is necessary. In the present work, the properties of hydrogenated and oxyfunctionalized turpentine have been analysed and compared with the purpose of elucidating their benefits and drawbacks in diesel fuel applications, using European standards as a reference. The results show a promising application of both hydroturpentine and oxyturpentine as diesel components. While hydroturpentine significantly improves the diesel cold flow properties, oxyturpentine noticeably reduces the sooting tendency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available