4.1 Article

Indication and Quantitative Assessment of Polyarene Sources in Soils by Statistical Modeling (Oil and Gas Extraction Area, Volgograd Region)

Journal

EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 807-815

Publisher

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1064229321050033

Keywords

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); sources of pollution; receptor models; Calcic Chernozems

Categories

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [14-17-00193]
  2. State budget project Natural and anthropogenic changes in landscape-geochemical and soil systems
  3. Russian Science Foundation [14-17-00193] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed a wide range of PAH concentrations in soils near Zhirnovsk town subjected to heterogeneous technogenic impact, with predominance of light PAHs and heavy PAHs mainly detected in urban areas.
The polyarene complex of soils was investigated, and PAH sources were assessed quantitatively in soils in the area subjected to heterogeneous technogenic impact near the town of Zhirnovsk, Volgograd oblast. The objects of study were the soils on interfluve areas within the oil and gas field, including soils of agricultural lands, floodplains, urban area, as well as oil-contaminated soils. PAH concentrations vary from 16 to 330000 ng/g; light PAHs, naphthalene and phenanthrene homologues are predominant; heavy PAHs were detected in the amount of 78.5 ng/g mainly in the urban area. The Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model was used to indicate and quantify the PAH sources. The following sources of PAHs were identified: emanation, old oil injection, new oil injection, traffic, public gas-pyrogenic, public wood-pyrogenic, and biogeochemical. They determine, respectively, the following associations of PAHs in soils: diphenyl, anthracene-chrysene, chrysene-naphthalene, fluorene-benzo[ghi]perylene, tetraphene-benzo[ghi]perylene, pyrene-anthracene-benzo[a]pyrene, and phenanthrene associations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available