4.3 Article

DETERMINATION OF QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF EUROPEAN PLUMS (PRUNUS DOMESTICA L.) CULTIVARS UNDER DIFFERENT DRYING CONDITIONS

Journal

PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 579-584

Publisher

PAKISTAN BOTANICAL SOC
DOI: 10.30848/PJB2021-2(42)

Keywords

Drying; European plum; Quality; Chemical analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the drying performance and quality attributes of Stanley's and Sugar's plum fruit using different types of dryers, with specific conditions achieving the closest values to fresh fruit in terms of color, pH, soluble solids content, acidity, phenolics, and antioxidants.
This study was carried out with Stanley's and Sugar's pulm fruit in two separate convective and microwave dryers such as cabin-type and precision. It determined the drying performance and final quality attributes of Stanley' and 'Sugar' plum fruit. The study also measured the quality characteristics such as color, acidity (pH), soluble solids content (SSC) (Brix), titratable acidity (TA), total phenolics (TP), and total antioxidants (according to TEAC and FRAP tests). Fresh samples of the fruits were dried in cabin-type dryers and at a drying air temperature of 60, 65 and 70 degrees C; and in the microwave dryer, dried for 30-50s at 540W and 30-50s at 720W at power outputs-hold times. The products were dried to wet-based moisture levels of 10-15%. For Stanley plums, the closest color, pH, SSC, TA, TP, TEAC, and FRAP values to the values of the fresh fruits (in other words, the most appropriate drying conditions) were respectively achieved in cabin 60 degrees C, cabin 60 degrees C, precision 65 degrees C, microwave 540 W-50 s, cabin 60 degrees C, cabin 60 degrees C and cabin 60-65 degrees C - precision 70 degrees C treatments. For Sugar plums, the closest values to fresh fruit were respectively obtained from precision 70 degrees C, cabin 60 degrees C, precision 70 degrees C, microwave 540 W-50 s, cabin 60 degrees C, cabin 60-65 degrees C, and precision 65 degrees C treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available