4.5 Review

Liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer: a key role in the future of personalized medicine?

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages 1089-1096

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1395701

Keywords

Liquid biopsy; ctDNA; non-small cell lung cancer; clinical application; personalised medicine

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81572282]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2015A030313539]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Liquid biopsies, especially the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), as a novel and non-invasive method for the diagnosis and monitoring of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have already been implemented in clinical settings. The majority of ctDNA is released from apoptotic or necrotic tumor cells, thus reflecting the genetic profile of a tumor. Numerous studies have reported a high concordance in mutation profiles derived from liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy, especially in driver genes. Liquid biopsy could overcome the clonal heterogeneity of tumour biopsy, as it provides a single snapshot of a tumour tissue. Moreover, non-invasiveness is the biggest advantage for liquid biopsy, and the procedure can be repeatedly performed during the treatment for the purpose of monitoring. Therefore, ctDNA could act as a potential complementary method for tissue biopsies in diagnosis, prognostic, treatment response and resistance. Areas covered: This review summarizes the recent advancements in liquid biopsy with a focus on NSCLC, including its applications and technologies associated with assessing ctDNA. The authors conclude the review by discussing the challenges associated with liquid biopsy. Expert commentary: The analysis of ctDNA represents a promising method for liquid biopsy, which will be a novel and potentially complementary method in diagnosis, treatment and prognostic in NSCLC at all stages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available