4.6 Article

Systematic Analysis of 4-gene Prognostic Signature in Patients with Diffuse Gliomas Based on Gene Expression Profiles

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 12, Issue 14, Pages 4295-4306

Publisher

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/jca.54565

Keywords

diffuse glioma; prognosis model; expression data; bioinformatics; systematic analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81560414]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified 67 genes associated with malignant progression of diffuse glioma using WGCNA method and established a 4-gene molecular marker including KDELR2, EMP3, TIMP1, and TAGLN2. The molecular marker served as an independent predictor of prognosis in patients with diffuse gliomas, showing good predictive power and associations with clinical and genetic backgrounds of gliomas.
Background: Diffuse gliomas are a group of diseases that contain different degrees of malignancy and complex heterogeneity. Previous studies proposed biomarkers for certain grades of gliomas, but few of them have conducted a systematic analysis of different grades to search for molecular markers. Methods: WGCNA was used to find significant genes associated with malignant progression of diffuse glioma in TCGA glioma sequencing expression data and the GEO expression profile-merge meta dataset. Lasso regression was used for potential model building and the best model was selected by CPE, IDI and C_index. Risk score model was used to evaluate the gene signature prognostic power. Multi-omics data, including CNV, methylation, clinical traits and mutation, were used for model evaluation. Results: We find out 67 genes significantly associated with malignant progression of diffuse glioma by WGCNA. Next, we establish a new 4 gene molecular marker (KDELR2, EMP3, TIMP1, and TAGLN2). Multivariate cox analysis identified the risk score of the 4 genes as an independent predictor of prognosis in patients with diffuse gliomas, and its predictive power was independent of the histopathological grades of glioma. Further, we had confirmed in five independent test datasets and the risk score remained good predictive power. The combination of the prognosis model with specific molecular characteristics possessed better predictive power than risk score solely and we divided the low-risk group into three subtypes: LowRisk_IDH1(wt), LowRisk_IDH1(mut)/ATRX(mut), and LowRisk_IDH1(mut)/ATRX(wt) by combining IDH1 mutation with ATRX mutation, which possessed obvious survival difference. In further analysis, we found that the 4 gene prognosis model possessed multi-omics features. Conclusion: we established a malignant-related 4-gene molecular marker by glioma expression profile data from multiple microarrays and sequencing data. The four markers had good predictive power on the overall survival of glioma patients and were associated with gliomas' clinical and genetic backgrounds, including clinical features, gene mutation, methylation, CNV, signal pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available