4.5 Article

Systematic calculations of reactions with exotic and stable nuclei to establish a unified theoretical approach

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054614

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities of Spain [PGC2018-096994-B-C21]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  3. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) [FIS2017-88410-P]
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [654002]
  5. SID funds 2019 (Investimento Strategico di Dipartimento, Universitti degli Studi di Padova, Italy) [CASA_SID19_01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study presents systematic optical model and continuum discretized coupled channel calculations for elastic scattering of exotic and stable nuclei projectiles on heavy targets, showing that the predictions from OM and CDCC corroborate each other and account for important differences in the nuclei reaction mechanisms.
We report on systematical optical model (OM) and continuum discretized coupled channel (CDCC) calculations applied to describe the elastic scattering angular distributions of exotic and stable nuclei projectiles on heavy targets. Our optical potential (OP) is composed of the nuclear microscopic double folding Sao Paulo potential (SPP), derived from the nonlocal nature of the interaction, and the Coulomb dipole polarization (CDP) potential, derived from the semiclassical theory of Coulomb excitation. The OP is compared to the trivial equivalent local potential (TELP), extracted from CDCC calculations. The OM and CDCC predictions corroborate each other and account for important differences in the nuclei reaction mechanisms, which are directly related to their structural properties. Thus, OM and CDCC establish a common basis for analyzing or even predicting exotic and stable nuclei reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available