4.4 Article

Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Across Different Body Mass Index Categories

Journal

JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 649-658

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.002

Keywords

atrial fibrillation; bleeding; obesity; oral anticoagulation; stroke; underweight

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In patients with atrial fibrillation, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with better safety and effectiveness compared to warfarin across all body mass index (BMI) categories, including BMI <18.5 and >= 40 kg/m(2).
OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) outcomes (vs. warfarin) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) across body mass index (BMI) categories, including >= 40 and <18.5 kg/m(2). BACKGROUND Clinical trials have not systematically tested the fixed DOAC dosing in underweight and morbidly obese patients. METHODS We retrospectively included consecutive patients with nonvalvular AF with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age >= 75, Diabetes, Stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic thromboembolism, Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex) of >= 1 receiving OACs at our hospital system (2010-2018). Patients were categorized into groups 1 (underweight: BMI of <18.5 kg/m(2)), 2 (normal/overweight: BMI of 18.5 to <30 kg/m(2)), 3 (grade 1/2 obesity: BMI of 30 to <40 kg/m(2)), and 4 (grade 3 obesity: BMI of >= 40 kg/m(2)). We further classified patients by DOAC versus warfarin use. Outcomes were ischemic stroke, significant bleeding events (i.e., resulting in hospitalization), and mortality. RESULTS We included 36,094 patients with a mean age of 74 +/- 11 years and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc of 3.4 +/- 1.5. Groups 1 through 4 included 455 (1.3%), 18,339 (50.8%), 13,376 (37.1%), and 3,924 (10.9%) patients, respectively. DOAC use ranged from 49% to 56%. At 3.8 follow-up years, with multivariable Cox regression, DOACs (vs. warfarin) were associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke, bleeding, and mortality across all BMI groups, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63 to 0.85), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.87), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.88), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.87) (p < 0.001 for all) for ischemic stroke; 0.42 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.92), 0.41 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.89), 0.45 (95% CI: 0.20 to 1.00), and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.20 to 0.94) (p < 0.05 for all) for bleeding; and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.68 to 1.19; p = 0.5), 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.75; p < 0.0001), 0.65 (95% CI: 0.60 to 0.71; p < 0.0001), and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.77; p < 0.0001) for mortality, in groups 1 to 4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with nonvalvular AF, DOACs compared to warfarin were associated with better safety and effectiveness across all BMI categories, including underweight and morbidly obese patients. (C) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available