4.1 Article

Topic classification of electric vehicle consumer experiences with transformer-based deep learning

Journal

PATTERNS
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100195

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1945332, 1931980]
  2. Microsoft Azure Sponsorship
  3. Ivan Allen College Dean's SGR-C Award
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1931980] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. SBE Off Of Multidisciplinary Activities
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1945332] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article utilizes deep learning technology to discover topics of attention in user reviews and applies it to public policy analysis and large-scale implementation, enhancing intelligence for the EV charging market.
The transportation sector is a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and is a driver of adverse health effects globally. Increasingly, government policies have promoted the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) as a solution to mitigate GHG emissions. However, government analysts have failed to fully utilize consumer data in decisions related to charging infrastructure. This is because a large share of EV data is unstructured text, which presents challenges for data discovery. In this article, we deploy advances in transformer-based deep learning to discover topics of attention in a nationally representative sample of user reviews. We report classification accuracies greater than 91% (F1 scores of 0.83), outperforming previously leading algorithms in this domain. We describe applications of these deep learning models for public policy analysis and large-scale implementation. This capability can boost intelligence for the EV charging market, which is expected to grow to US$27.6 billion by 2027.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available