4.2 Article

How to Reach a Safe Circular Economy?-Perspectives on Reconciling the Waste, Product and Chemicals Regulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 113-136

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jel/eqaa016

Keywords

circular economy; chemicals; waste; recovery; substances of concern; risk

Funding

  1. Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland as part of the project CICAT2025, Circular Economy Catalysts: From Innovation to Business Ecosystems [320194/320206]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the regulation of 'substances of concern' in the Circular Economy in the European Union. It argues for erasing the border between waste and chemicals regulation and creating a unified regulatory regime. Regulatory actions addressing the risks posed by substances of concern in waste-based material flows are urgently needed.
This article discusses the regulation of 'substances of concern' in the circular economy (CE) in the European Union (EU). It analyses the tensions and obstacles that the present sectoral separation of waste, product and chemicals legislation sets for the development of the CE. We argue that in a longer term perspective the aim should be to erase the border between waste and chemicals regulation and create a single regime for the regulation of materials and their flow. However, the eventual aim of such non-toxic material circulation can be achieved only via precautious transitional measures that outweigh the costs and benefits of each material flow and set restrictions for the particular substances of concern. Regulatory actions addressing the risks posed by the substances of concern in the waste-based material flows are urgently needed. New measures are necessary to protect human health and the environment and to support the development of the markets for the secondary materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available