4.5 Review

TRAP1: a viable therapeutic target for future cancer treatments?

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC TARGETS
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 805-815

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14728222.2017.1349755

Keywords

Cancer; endoplasmic reticulum; HSP90; mitochondria; molecular chaperone; protein quality control; TRAP1; tumor metabolism

Funding

  1. AIRC [IG2015, 16738, IG16977]
  2. University of Foggia (PRA Grant)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: HSP90 molecular chaperones (i.e., HSP90a, HSP90 beta, GRP94 and TRAP1) are potential therapeutic targets to design novel anticancer agents. However, despite numerous designed HSP90 inhibitors, most of them have failed due to unfavorable toxicity profiles and lack of specificity toward different HSP90 paralogs. Indeed, a major limitation in this field is the high structural homology between different HSP90 chaperones, which significantly limits our capacity to design paralog-specific inhibitors. Area covered: This review examines the relevance of TRAP1 in tumor development and progression, with an emphasis on its oncogenic/oncosuppressive role in specific human malignancies and its multifaceted and context-dependent functions in cancer cells. Herein, we discuss the rationale for considering TRAP1 as a potential molecular target and the strategies used to date, to achieve its compartmentalized inhibition directly in mitochondria. Expert opinion: TRAP1 targeting may represent a promising strategy for cancer therapy, based on the increasing and compelling evidence supporting TRAP1 involvement in human carcinogenesis. However, considering the complexity of TRAP1 biology, future strategies of drug discovery need to improve selectivity and specificity toward TRAP1 respect to other HSP90 paralogs. The characterization of specific human malignancies suitable for TRAP1 targeting is also mandatory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available