4.5 Article

Small-molecule HIV-1 entry inhibitors targeting gp120 and gp41: a patent review (2010-2015)

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 707-719

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13543776.2017.1281249

Keywords

HIV-1; gp120; gp41; small-molecule; entry inhibitor; C-terminal heptad repeat (CHR); N-terminal heptad repeat (NHR)

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81361120378, 81373456]
  2. National 863 Program of China [2015AA020930]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: It is essential to discover and develop small-molecule HIV-1 entry inhibitors with suitable pharmaceutical properties. Areas covered: We review the development of small-molecule HIV-1 entry inhibitors as evidenced in patents, patent applications, and related research articles published between 2010 and 2015. Expert opinion: HIV-1 Env gp120 and gp41 are important targets for development of HIV-1 entry inhibitors. The Phe43 pocket in gp120 and the highly conserved hydrophobic pocket on gp41 NHR-trimer are important targets for identification of HIV-1 attachment and fusion inhibitors, respectively. Compounds that bind to Phe43 pocket can block viral gp120 binding to CD4 on T cells, thus inhibiting HIV-1 attachment. However, most compounds targeting Phe43 pocket identified so far are HIV-1 entry agonists with the ability to enhance infectivity of HIV-1 in CD4-negative cells. Therefore, it is essential to identify HIV-1 entry antagonist-based HIV-1 attachment/entry inhibitors. Compounds binding to the gp41 hydrophobic pocket may inhibit CHR binding to the gp41 NHR trimer, thus blocking six-helix bundle formation and gp41-mediated virus-cell fusion. However, most lead compounds targeting this pocket have low potency, possibly because the pocket is too big or too deep. Therefore, it is necessary to identify other pockets in gp41 for developing HIV-1 fusion/entry inhibitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available