4.7 Article

Recycled nylon fibers as cement mortar reinforcement

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages 200-209

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.075

Keywords

Fiber reinforced mortar; Recycled nylon; Waste fishing nets; Flexural strength; Toughness

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Italy-USA Scientific and Technological Cooperation ('Lavoro realizzato con il contributo del Ministero degli Affari Esteri, Direzione Generale per la Promozione del Sistema Paese') [00173/2014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate engineering applications of recycled nylon fibers obtained from waste fishing nets, focusing our attention on the use of recycled nylon fibers as tensile reinforcement of cementitious mortars. We begin by characterizing the tensile behavior of both unconditioned and alkali-cured recycled nylon fibers obtained through manual cutting of waste fishing net filaments, with the aim of assessing the resistance of such materials to chemical attacks. Special attention is also given to evaluating the workability of fresh mortar and the possible impacts of contaminants released by waste fishing nets into the environment. Next, we deal with compression and bending tests on cementitious mortars reinforced with recycled nylon fibers, and establish comparisons with the experimental behavior of the unreinforced material and with results given in existing literature. In our analysis of different weight fractions and aspect ratios of the reinforcing fibers, we observe marked increases in the tensile strength (up to +35%) and toughness (up to 13 times greater) of the nylon reinforced mortar, as compared with the unreinforced material. The presented results emphasize the high environmental and mechanical potential of recycled nylon fibers for the reinforcement of sustainable cement mortars. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available