3.8 Article

Virtual reality three-dimensional echocardiographic imaging tor planning surgical atrioventricular valve repair

Journal

JTCVS TECHNIQUES
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 269-277

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.02.044

Keywords

virtual reality; congenital heart disease; surgery; atrioventricular valves; evolving technology

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) i4i [II-LA-0716-20001]
  2. Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering [WT 203148/Z/16/Z]
  3. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London
  4. NIHR Clinical Research Facility (CRF) at Guy's and St Thomas
  5. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [II-LA-0716-20001] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

VR imaging had a positive impact on surgeons' confidence in understanding patient pathology and surgical approach, with 67% reporting increased confidence. Surgeons generally reported minor modifications to surgical approach in 53% of cases after viewing patients on VR, highlighting the potential benefits of VR visualization in atrioventricular valve surgery.
Objectives: To investigate how virtual reality (VR) imaging impacts decision-making in atrioventricular valve surgery. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study involving 15 children and adolescents, median age 6 years (range, 0.33-16) requiring surgical repair of the atrioventricular valves between the years 2016 and 2019. The patients' preoperative 3-dimesnional (3D) echocardiographic data were used to create 3D visualization in a VR application. Five pediatric cardiothoracic surgeons completed a questionnaire formulated to compare their surgical decisions regarding the cases after reviewing conventionally presented 2-dimesnional and 3D echocardiographic images and again after visualization of 3D echocardiograms using the VR platform. Finally, intraoperative findings were shared with surgeons to confirm assessment of the pathology. Results: In 67% of cases presented with VR, surgeons reported having more or much more confidence in their understanding of each patient's pathology and their surgical approach. In all but one case, surgeons were at least as confident after reviewing the VR compared with standard imaging. The case where surgeons reported to be least confident on VR had the worst technical quality of data used. After viewing patient cases on VR, surgeons reported that they would have made minor modifications to surgical approach in 53% and major modifications in 7% of cases. Conclusions: The main impact of viewing imaging on VR is the improved clarity of the anatomical structures. Surgeons reported that this would have impacted the surgical approach in the majority of cases. Poor-quality 3D echocardiographic data were associated with a negative impact of VR visualization; thus. quality assessment of imaging is necessary before projecting in a VR format.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available