4.5 Review

Investigational Janus kinase inhibitors in development for myelofibrosis

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 723-734

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2017.1323871

Keywords

Myelofibrosis; momelotinib; pacritinib; NS-018; RUXOLITINIB; INCB039110; CHZ868; JAK inhibitors

Funding

  1. MD Anderson Cancer Center from the National Cancer Institute [P30 CA016672]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Since the discovery of the activating V617F mutation in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), a number of pharmacologic inhibitors of JAK2 have entered clinical trials for patients with myelofibrosis. However, ruxolitinib, approved in 2011, remains the only one currently available for treatment of myelofibrosis, with many others having been discontinued for toxicity, and considerable uncertainty surrounding the future of those still in development.Areas covered: The available clinical data on pacritinib and momelotinib, the two agents in the most advanced phases of clinical testing in myelofibrosis, are examined in detail. NS-018 and INCB039110, selective inhibitors of JAK2 and JAK1, respectively, are also discussed. Finally, the JAK2 inhibitors no longer in clinical development are summarized in tabular form.Expert opinion: The different agents evaluated clearly differ in their kinomes, toxicity profiles and potential for myelosuppression. If approved, the JAK2-specific non-myelosuppressive inhibitor pacritinib could fulfill a major unmet need, that of patients with significant cytopenias. However, toxicity concerns persist. The data from the pivotal trials of momelotinib do not support its approval, although improvement of anemia is an important benefit. Selective JAK1 inhibition alone is unlikely to succeed in myelofibrosis. In these circumstances, rational ruxolitinib-based combinations may represent the best way forward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available