4.3 Review

Non-chemotherapy drug-induced neutropenia - an update

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 1235-1242

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1376645

Keywords

Drug; neutropenia; agranulocytosis; idiosyncratic; non-chemotherapy; hematopoietic growth factor

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. BMS
  3. Pfizer
  4. Leo
  5. Ferring
  6. Chugai
  7. Amgen
  8. Roche

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: To date, non-chemotherapy drug-induced severe neutropenia (neutrophil count of <= 0.5 x 10(9)/L) also called idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis is little discussed in the literature. In the present paper, we report and discuss the clinical data and management of this rare disorder. Areas covered: To do this, we carried out a review of the literature using PubMed database of the US National Library of Medicine. We also used data from the American Society of Hematology educational books, textbooks of Hematology and Internal medicine, and information gleaned from international meetings. Expert opinion: Idiosyncratic agranulocytosis remains a potentially serious adverse event due to the frequency of severe sepsis with severe deep tissue infections (e.g., pneumonia), septicemia, and septic shock in approximately two-thirds of all hospitalized patients. In this context, several prognostic factors have been identified that may be helpful when identifying 'susceptible' patients. Old age (>65 years), septicemia or shock, renal failure, and a neutrophil count <= 0.1 x 10(9)/L have been consensually accepted as poor prognostic factors. In our experience, modern management with pre-established procedures, intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics and hematopoietic growth factors (particularly G-CSF) is likely to improve the prognosis. Thus with appropriate management, the mortality rate is currently between 5 to 10%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available