4.2 Review

Application of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Predictive Models to Water Treatment: A Critical Review

Journal

ACS ES&T WATER
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 498-517

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.0c00206

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Collaborative Water-Energy Research Center (CoWERC) - Binational Industrial Research and Development Foundation under Energy Center Grant [EC-15]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI) [18H01566]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

QSPR modeling has been used in water treatment to reduce experimental load and predict treatment characteristics effectively. However, methods for testing the applicability of QSPR models under environmentally relevant conditions have not been explored.
The large number of pollutants in water requires the application of various water treatment techniques. However, it is time-consuming, costly, and laborious to experimentally determine effective techniques for pollutant removal. As an alternative solution, quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) modeling has been applied to water treatments, including adsorption, membrane filtration, coagulation, ozonation, the Fenton reaction, photolysis, and photocatalysis. This work is a critical review of the application of QSPR models to water treatment. This modeling approach has proven to be useful for both significantly reducing the experimental load and predicting the treatment characteristics and performance, which are based on the chemical structures involved, the availability of molecular properties with minimal computational cost, and the applicability for regulatory purposes. Although current studies can serve as a basis for further model development, methods of testing the applicability of QSPR models under environmentally relevant conditions have not been explored. We also examine current priorities in ongoing research and the potential development of QSPR models for water treatment applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available