4.5 Article

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of osimertinib for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 1281-1288

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1401064

Keywords

Afatinib; EGFR; erlotinib; gefitinib; icotinib; NSCLC; osimertinib; rociletinib; T790M; ulmutinib

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, AIRC/MFAG [12983]
  2. Italian Ministry of Health, Ricerca Corrente [RC1703AP30, RC1703LO41, RC1703ON39]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: First- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), such as gefitinib, erlotinib, icotinib, and afatinib are the standard-of-care for first-line therapy of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring activating EGFR mutations. Unfortunately, after initial activity of an average 9-13 months, disease progression has been reported in the majority of patients. In about 50% of cases the progression is due to the onset of the T790M mutation in exon 20 of the EGFR gene. Third-generation EGFR-TKIs targeting this mutation were investigated, with osimertinib the only reaching clinical practice. Areas covered: A structured search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature and of main meetings using a focused review question addressing osimertinib, was undertaken. Expert opinion: Osimertinib is the standard-of-care for EGFR-mutated patients progressing to first-line EGFR-TKIs due to the acquired EGFR T790M mutation. Results from the head-to-head first-line trial comparing osimertinib versus gefitinib or erlotinib in activating EGFR mutations might change the front-line approach. Osimertinib in combination regimens, such as immunotherapy, and in adjuvant setting are ongoing. Thus, the strategic approach for the management of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients will change further in the next few years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available