4.5 Review

Enhancing the therapeutic potential of peptide toxins

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 611-623

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2017.1317243

Keywords

Cone snail; sea anemone; scorpion; proteolysis; disulfide; cyclisation; PEGylation; delivery; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [1059060, 1042481, 1093450]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP120100414, LP150100621]
  3. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1093450, 1059060] Funding Source: NHMRC
  5. Australian Research Council [LP150100621, LP120100414] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Peptide toxins are potent and often exquisitely selective probes of the structure and function of ion channels and receptors, and as such are of significant interest to the pharmaceutical and biotech industries as both therapeutic leads and pharmacological tools. Their progression as clinical candidates, however, faces many of the challenges that are common to peptide drugs generally. Areas covered: The attributes of peptide toxins as therapeutic leads are outlined, as well as some of the limiting factors that have hampered the clinical development of many promising candidates. Strategies to overcome or circumvent these limitations are described, and their applications to peptide toxins from cone snails, sea anemones and scorpions are exemplified. Expert opinion: Peptide toxins have exceeded their promise as valuable pharmacological tools but have yet to yield the anticipated bounty of therapeutic leads. As the number of new peptides identified in venom transcriptomes and proteomes expands rapidly, screening approaches that capture those with genuine therapeutic potential are required, along with methods for enhancing the stability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these peptides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available