4.3 Article

Measuring Race and Ancestry in the Age of Genetic Testing

Journal

DEMOGRAPHY
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 785-810

Publisher

DUKE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1215/00703370-9142013

Keywords

Genealogy; Genetics; Racial classification; Survey design

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21HG008041-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rise of genetic ancestry tests (GATs) is changing how Americans respond to questions about race and ancestry by increasing the likelihood of self-identification as multiracial, especially selecting three or more races. This increase in multiracial reporting among GAT takers is influenced by factors such as higher likelihood of identifying as multiracial, reporting multiple regions of ancestral origin, and translating ancestral diversity into multiracial self-identification. The meaning of race data in the U.S. may be evolving as more Americans are exposed to GAT information.
Will the rise of genetic ancestry tests (GATs) change how Americans respond to questions about race and ancestry on censuses and surveys? To provide an answer, we draw on a unique study of more than 100,000 U.S. adults that inquired about respondents' race, ancestry, and genealogical knowledge. We find that people in our sample who have taken a GAT, compared with those who have not, are more likely to self-identify as multiracial and are particularly likely to select three or more races. This difference in multiplerace reporting stems from three factors: (1) people who identify as multiracial arc more likely to take GATs; (2) GAT takers are more likely to report multiple regions of ancestral origin;. and (3) GAT takers more frequently translate reported ancestral diversity into multiracial self-identification. Our results imply that Americans will select three or more races at higher rates in future demographic data collection. with marked increases in multiple-race reporting among middle-aged adults. We also present experimental evidence that asking questions about ancestry before racial identification moderates some of these GAT-linked reporting differences. Demographers should consider how the meaning of U.S. race data may be changing as more Americans are exposed to information from GATs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available