4.7 Article

What's the beef?: Debating meat, matters of concern and the emergence of online issue publics

Journal

JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 134-146

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.03.008

Keywords

Debating meat; Matters of concern; Online issue publics; Twitter hashtags

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent scientific publications have urged significant reductions in meat consumption to mitigate the negative impacts of the food system on the planet. However, the public debate surrounding this issue is complex and involves competing narratives on plant-based and alternative-protein diets. Analyzing Twitter data, the study found that #eatlessmeat tweets generated more mentions and diverse content compared to #sustainablemeat tweets. Additionally, commercially invested users were prominent on Twitter, using the platform for marketing purposes.
A number of recent scientific publications have called for significant reductions in meat consumption in order to mitigate the negative impacts of the food system on the planet. Public debate around this issue is not straightforward, however, with plant-based and alternative-protein narratives contested by an agro-ecological narrative. These competing narratives are being played out in both scientific and public discourses, with social media emerging as an important vehicle. Seeking to understand the nature of the 'online issue publics' forming around this issue, the paper draws on an analysis of Twitter data to assess 'sustainable meat' narratives as 'matters of concern' (Latour, 2004, 2018), rooted in the discrepant views, disputes and disagreements that typically coalesce around such issues. To this end, #sustainablemeat AND #ethicalmeat, and #eatlessmeat hashtags, respectively, were compared, as examples of debating meat. Two key insights emerged. Firstly, there is limited evidence of an encompassing debate on Twitter; #eatlessmeat tweets generated more frequent mentions and greater heterogeneity of content than #sustainablemeat tweets. Secondly, the prominence of commercially invested users using Twitter for marketing purposes; #sustainablemeat tweets were orientated toward promoting a business or the production of meat, whereas #eatlessmeat tweets showed a greater association with planetary issues and an evolution of the 'vegan' narrative. Individuals and organisations who are already invested in an issue use specialist hashtags. Specific 'sustainable meat' narratives on Twitter signal the multiplicity of debates that currently surround this contested issue which, as 'matters of concern', is still in the early stages of development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available