4.6 Article

Prediction of risk factors of cyberbullying-related words in Korea: Application of data mining using social big data

Journal

TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101524

Keywords

Social big data; Data mining; Decision trees; Cyberbullying

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study used social big data to analyze the types of risk factors related to cyberbullying in Korea, finding that impulse and propensity for dominance were the main factors influencing cyberbullying, especially among bystanders and perpetrators. It is necessary to develop a program to reduce impulses that lead to cyberbullying behaviors.
The study examined a decision tree analysis using social big data to conduct the prediction model on types of risk factors related to cyberbullying in Korea. The study conducted an analysis of 103,212 buzzes that had noted causes of cyberbullying and data were collected from 227 online channels, such as news websites, blogs, online groups, social network services, and online bulletin boards. Using opinion-mining method and decision tree analysis, the types of cyberbullying were sorted using SPSS 25.0. The results indicated that the total rate of types of cyberbullying in Korea was 44%, which consisted of 32.3% victims, 6.4% perpetrators, and 5.3% bystanders. According to the results, the impulse factor was also the greatest influence on the prediction of the risk factors and the propensity for dominance factor was the second greatest factor predicting the types of risk factors. In particular, the impulse factor had the most significant effect on bystanders, and the propensity for dominance factor was also significant in influencing online perpetrators. It is necessary to develop a program to diminish the impulses that were initiated by bystanders as well as victims and perpetrators because many of those bystanders have tended to aggravate impulsive cyberbullying behaviors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available