4.7 Article

Analysis of compressive strength development of concrete containing high volume fly ash

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 98, Issue -, Pages 810-819

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.099

Keywords

High volume fly ash; Compressive strength; Hardening concrete; Hydration; Pozzolanic reaction; Model

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2015R1A5A1037548]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fly ash is a principal by-product of the coal-fired power plants and is well accepted as a pozzolanic, material that may be used as a mineral admixture in concrete. High-volume fly ash (HVFA) concrete, which has typically 50-60% fly ash as the total cementitious materials' content, is widely used to achieve the sustainable development of concrete industry. Compressive strength development is the most important engineering property of hardening concrete. This paper presents a numerical procedure to evaluate the compressive strength development of HVFA concrete. The numerical procedure starts with a blended hydration model considering cement hydration, fly ash reaction, and interactions between cement hydration and fly ash reaction. Using the hydration model, the hydration degree of cement and reaction degree of fly ash are determined as functions of curing age. Furthermore, calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) contents of hardening HVFA concrete are calculated using reaction degrees of binders and mixing proportions of concrete. Finally, the compressive strengths of hardening HVFA concrete are determined using CSH contents. The proposed numerical procedure is valid for concrete with different water to binder ratios (ordinary strength concrete and ultra high strength concrete) and different fly ash contents (low volume fly ash and high volume fly ash). (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available