4.1 Article

Determination of spatial mercury concentration by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 193-198

Publisher

JAPANESE SOC TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.2131/jts.46.193

Keywords

Laser ablation; ICP-MS; Methylmercury; Cold vaper atomic absorption spectrophotometry; Kidney

Categories

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [18H03380, 19H01081, 19K16346, 19H05772]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H05772, 19H01081, 18H03380, 19K16346] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A highly quantitative mercury imaging method was established utilizing LA-ICP-MS with a homogeneous mercury standard consisting of rat tissue, showing good linearity between concentration and signal intensity. The study demonstrated that LA-ICP-MS enabled quantitative imaging with the appropriate standard, with comparable results to cold vapor AAS.
Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) is capable of metal imaging by acquiring local spatial information. However, the preparation of an appropriate standard for quantitative analysis is difficult because the matrices between the standard and the sample should match, and homogeneity of metal concentration in the standard is required. Hence, the aim of this study was to establish a highly quantitative mercury imaging method that utilizes LA-ICP-MS and an appropriate mercury standard consisting of rat tissue. Our standard showed homogeneous mercury concentration and good linearity between concentration and signal intensity, and met the qualifications for quantitative imaging by LA-ICP-MS. Mercury concentration in MeHg-exposed rat kidneys obtained by LA-ICP-MS measurement of the standard (7.84 +/- 0.57 mu g/g) was comparable to that obtained by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS, 7.27 +/- 0.46 mu g/g). The results indicate that LA-ICP-MS enabled quantitative imaging with the appropriate standard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available