4.6 Review

Electrochemically active site-rich nanocomposites of two-dimensional materials as anode catalysts for direct oxidation fuel cells: new age beyond graphene

Journal

NANOSCALE ADVANCES
Volume 3, Issue 13, Pages 3681-3707

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1na00046b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UGC
  2. N-BIOS award project, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct oxidation fuel cell (DOFC) is considered a green alternative to fossil fuels with economic viability and high efficiency, with the anode catalyst being a critical component. Recently, there has been increased interest in using 2D materials as anode catalysts due to their excellent electrochemical properties, offering potential solutions to challenges in DOFC development.
Direct oxidation fuel cell (DOFC) has been opted as a green alternative to fossil fuels and intermittent energy resources as it is economically viable, possesses good conversion efficiency, as well as exhibits high power density and superfast charging. The anode catalyst is a vital component of DOFC, which improves the oxidation of fuels; however, the development of an efficient anode catalyst is still a challenge. In this regard, 2D materials have attracted attention as DOFC anode catalysts due to their fascinating electrochemical properties such as excellent mechanical properties, large surface area, superior electron transfer, presence of active sites, and tunable electronic states. This timely review encapsulates in detail different types of fuel cells, their mechanisms, and contemporary challenges; focuses on the anode catalyst/support based on new generation 2D materials, namely, 2D transition metal carbide/nitride or carbonitride (MXene), graphitic carbon nitride, transition metal dichalcogenides, and transition metal oxides; as well as their properties and role in DOFC along with the mechanisms involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available