4.0 Article

Colony-forming units optimization and human papillomavirus detection in umbilical cord blood

Journal

GACETA MEDICA DE MEXICO
Volume 157, Issue 1, Pages 30-36

Publisher

ACAD NACIONAL MEDICINA MEXICO
DOI: 10.24875/GMM.19005696

Keywords

Human papillomavirus; Clonogenic cultures; Colony-forming units; Umbilical cord blood units; DNA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to optimize colony-forming units (CFU) from umbilical cord blood units (UCBU) and detect the human papillomavirus (HPV) genome. The results showed that the DNA concentration extracted from CFU was higher compared to UCB and segments, and all samples tested positive for GAPDH amplification and negative for HPV genes.
Introduction: Analysis of several markers is required for adequate quality control in umbilical cord blood units (UCBU) when are used for therapeutic purposes. Objective: To optimize colony-forming units (CFU) from clonogenic cultures and to detect the human papillomavirus (HPV) genome in UCBU. Methods: One hundred and forty-one umbilical cord blood (UCB), segment or CFU samples from UCBU clonogenic cultures were included. DNA extraction, quantification and endogenous GAPDH gene PCR amplification were carried out. Subsequently, HPV L1 gene was detected using the MY09/MY11 and GP5/GP6+ oligonucleotides. PCR products were analyzed with electrophoresis in agarose gel. CFU-extracted purified DNA was analyzed by electrophoresis in agarose gel, as well as some DNAs, using the SSP technique. Results: CFU-extracted DNA concentration was higher in comparison with that of UCB (p = 0.0041) and that of the segment (p < 0.0001), as well as that of UCB in comparison with that of the segment (p < 0.0001). All samples were positive for GAPDH amplification and negative for MY09/MY11 and GP5/GP6+. Conclusions: Cryopreserved UCBUs were HPV-negative. Obtaining CFU DNA from clonogenic cultures with high concentrations and purity is feasible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available