4.6 Article

Modelling Small-Scale Storage Interventions in Semi-Arid India at the Basin Scale

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13116129

Keywords

semi-arid hydrology; small-scale storage; check dams; tanks; farm bunds; Cauvery; GWAVA

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC-UKRI)
  2. India Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES) [NE/N016491/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on the impact of small-scale water storage interventions in the Cauvery Basin of India, finding that farm bunds have a negligible effect while tanks and check dams have a more significant impact on water balance. The open water surface of the interventions leads to increased evaporation losses, while the change in simulated groundwater storage is not as significant as expected. The model adaptation used in this study advances the understanding of small-scale storage interventions in large-scale hydrological models.
There has been renewed interest in the performance, functionality, and sustainability of traditional small-scale storage interventions (check dams, farm bunds and tanks) used within semi-arid regions for the improvement of local water security and landscape preservation. The Central Groundwater Board of India is encouraging the construction of such interventions for the alleviation of water scarcity and to improve groundwater recharge. It is important for water resource management to understand the hydrological effect of these interventions at the basin scale. The quantification of small-scale interventions in hydrological modelling is often neglected, especially in large-scale modelling activities, as data availability is low and their hydrological functioning is uncertain. A version of the Global Water Availability Assessment (GWAVA) water resources model was developed to assess the impact of interventions on the water balance of the Cauvery Basin and two smaller sub-catchments. Model results demonstrate that farm bunds appear to have a negligible effect on the average annual simulated streamflow at the outlets of the two sub-catchments and the basin, whereas tanks and check dams have a more significant and time varying effect. The open water surface of the interventions contributed to an increase in evaporation losses across the catchment. The change in simulated groundwater storage with the inclusion of interventions was not as significant as catchment-scale literature and field studies suggest. The model adaption used in this study provides a step-change in the conceptualisation and quantification of the consequences of small-scale storage interventions in large- or basin-scale hydrological models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available