4.7 Article

Safety Analysis of Long-Range and High-Power Wireless Power Transfer Using Resonant Beam

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 2833-2843

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2021.3076893

Keywords

Electromagnetic field analysis; resonant beam charging; wireless power transfer; inherent safety

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFB2103900, 2020YFB2103902]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771344, 62071334]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article introduces an analytical model for evaluating the safety of the Resonant Beam Charging system, demonstrating its capability to achieve safe and efficient wireless power transfer at Watt-level power over long distances, while meeting necessary safety requirements for human skin exposure.
Resonant Beam Charging (RBC) is a promising Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) technology to realize long-range and high-power charging for electronic devices. However, the safety mechanism of the RBC system has not been investigated so far. In this paper, we propose an analytical model based on electromagnetic field analysis for evaluating the performance of the RBC system with external object invasion, such as the benchmark for the WPT safety, irradiance on the invading object. For the RBC system with 5 m transmission distance and 1 W output electric power, the safety numerical analysis of radiation illustrates that the maximum irradiance on the invading object is 0.81 W/cm(2), which is approximately 1/10 compared with 8.22 W/cm(2) for the comparable laser charging system. Particularly, the peak irradiance on the invading object of the RBC system satisfies the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) requirement for human skin, which is 1 W/cm(2) in the standard Safety of Laser Products IEC 60825 - 1. Hence, the RBC system can realize skin-safe WPT with Watt-level power over meter-level distance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available