4.0 Article

Measuring the Generosity of Parental Leave Policies

Journal

SOCIAL INCLUSION
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 238-249

Publisher

COGITATIO PRESS
DOI: 10.17645/si.v9i2.3943

Keywords

administrative data; benefit generosity; inclusiveness; leave policies; parental leave; social policy indicators; social rights; survey data

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (MSCA IF) [893008]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [893008] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scientists, opinion-makers, and politicians use indicators to investigate and compare welfare states or specific welfare programmes. The choice of indicators plays a significant role in comparing the generosity of public welfare provision among different countries, and must be carefully considered.
In order to investigate and compare welfare states or specific welfare programmes, scientists, opinion-makers and politicians rely on indicators. As many of the concepts or objects studied are somewhat abstract, these indicators can often only be approximations. In comparative welfare-state research, scholars have suggested several approximating indicators to quantitatively measure and compare the generosity of public welfare provision, with a special focus on cash benefits. These indicators include social spending, social rights and benefit receipt. We present these indicators systematically, and critically discuss how suitable they are for comparing the generosity of parenting leave policies in developed welfare states. Subsequently, we illustrate how the operationalisation of leave generosity by means of different indicators can lead to different rankings, interpretations and qualifications of countries. Hence, indicator choices have to be considered carefully and suitably justified, depending on the actual research interest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available