Positive Semidefinite Matrix Factorization: A Connection With Phase Retrieval and Affine Rank Minimization

Positive semidefinite matrix factorization (PSDMF) expresses each entry of a nonnegative matrix as the inner product of two positive semidefinite (psd) matrices. When all these psd matrices are constrained to be diagonal, this model is equivalent to nonnegative matrix factorization. Applications include combinatorial optimization, quantum-based statistical models, and recommender systems, among others. However, despite the increasing interest in PSDMF, only a few PSDMF algorithms were proposed in the literature. In this work, we provide a collection of tools for PSDMF, by showing that PSDMF algorithms can be designed based on phase retrieval (PR) and affine rank minimization (ARM) algorithms. This procedure allows a shortcut in designing new PSDMF algorithms, as it allows to leverage some of the useful numerical properties of existing PR and ARM methods to the PSDMF framework. Motivated by this idea, we introduce a new family of PSDMF algorithms based on iterative hard thresholding (IHT). This family subsumes previously-proposed projected gradient PSDMF methods. We show that there is high variability among PSDMF optimization problems that makes it beneficial to try a number of methods based on different principles to tackle difficult problems. In certain cases, our proposed methods are the only algorithms able to find a solution. In certain other cases, they converge faster. Our results support our claim that the PSDMF framework can inherit desired numerical properties from PR and ARM algorithms, leading to more efficient PSDMF algorithms, and motivate further study of the links between these models.

Automated summary

Positive semidefinite matrix factorization (PSDMF) expresses nonnegative matrices as the inner product of two positive semidefinite matrices. By leveraging phase retrieval and affine rank minimization algorithms, new PSDMF algorithms can be designed for a more efficient optimization process. High variability in PSDMF problems necessitates trying a variety of methods, with some cases showing our proposed methods as the only ones able to find solutions.