4.2 Review

Genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity and the impact on cancer relapse

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 26-30

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2017.07.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Starr Cancer Consortium, New York, NY, USA [I7-A765, I9-A9-071]
  2. Irma T. Hirschl Trust and Monique Weill-Caulier Charitable Trust, New York, NY, USA
  3. Bert L. & N. Kuggie Vallee Foundation, Boston, MA, USA
  4. WorldQuant Foundation, Greenwich, CT, USA
  5. Pershing Square Sohn Cancer Research Alliance, New York, NY, USA
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Houston, TX, USA [NNX14AH50G, 15-15Omni2-0063]
  7. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA [OPP1151054]
  8. NASA [683584, NNX14AH50G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  9. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation - Grand Challenges Explorations Initiative [OPP1151054] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematopoietic malignancy with an exceedingly poor prognosis: a 5-year overall survival rate of 40%-45 % in the young and a 5-year survival rate of less than 10% in the elderly (> 60 years of age). Although a high percentage of patients enters complete remission after chemotherapeutic intervention, the majority of patients relapse within 3 years. Such stark prognostic outcomes highlight the need for additional clinical research, basic discovery, and molecular delineation of the etiologies and mechanisms behind responses to therapy that lead to relapse. Here, we summarize recent discoveries in tumor heterogeneity at the genetic and epigenetic levels and their independent molecular trajectories and dynamics in response to therapy. These new discoveries may have significant implications for understanding, monitoring, and treating leukemia and other cancers. (c) 2017 ISEH - Society for Hematology and Stem Cells. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available