4.1 Article

Role of interface morphology on the martensitic transformation in pure Fe

Journal

MATERIALIA
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101085

Keywords

Martensitic transformation; Interface morphology; Molecular dynamics simulations

Funding

  1. SERB [CRG/2019/006961]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using classical molecular dynamics simulations, this study investigates the influence of interface morphology on the austenite to ferrite phase transformation in iron. The findings reveal the impact of interface morphology on atomic displacements, stacking fault nucleation, and interface mobility during the phase transformation process. Additionally, the study highlights the opposite temperature dependence trends of interface mobility between flat and ledged boundaries.
Using classical molecular dynamics simulations, we study austenite to ferrite phase transformation in iron, focusing on the role of interface morphology. We compare two different morphologies; a flat interface in which the two phases are joined according to Nishiyama-Wasserman orientation relationship vs. a ledged one, having steps similar to the vicinal surface. We identify the atomic displacements along a misfit dislocation network at the interface leading to the phase transformation. In the case of the ledged interface, stacking faults are nucleated at the steps, which hinder the interface motion, leading to lower mobility of the inter-phase boundary, than that of a flat interface. Interestingly, we also find the temperature dependence of the interface mobility to show opposite trends in the case of flat vs. ledged boundary. We believe that our study is going to present a unified and comprehensive view of martensitic transformation in iron with different interface morphologies, which is lacking at present, as flat and ledged interfaces are treated separately in the existing literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available