4.7 Article

Remaining Useful Life Assessment for Lithium-Ion Batteries Using CNN-LSTM-DNN Hybrid Method

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages 4252-4261

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2021.3071622

Keywords

Prediction algorithms; Lithium-ion batteries; Predictive models; Support vector machines; Training; Particle filters; Long short term memory; Lithium-ion batteries; machine learning; remaining useful life; long short term memory; deep neural network; convolutional neural network

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [315082]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper suggests a hybrid method utilizing machine learning for predicting the remaining useful life of lithium-ion batteries, demonstrating the potential of new data-driven estimation approaches in battery life prediction.
The prediction of a Lithium-ion battery's lifetime is very important for ensuring safety and reliability. In addition, it is utilized as an early warning system to prevent the battery's failure. Recent advance in Machine Learning (ML) is an enabler for new data-driven estimation approaches. In this paper, we suggest a hybrid method, named the CNN-LSTM-DNN, which is a combination of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short Term Memory (LSTM), and Deep Neural Networks (DNN), for the estimation of the battery's remaining useful life (RUL) and improving prediction accuracy with acceptable execution time. A comparison against various ML estimation algorithms is carried out to show the superiority of the proposed hybrid estimation approach. For that, three statistical indicators, i.e., the MAE, R-2, and RMSE, are selected to assess numerically the prediction results. Experimental validation is performed using two datasets of different lithium-ion batteries from NASA and CALCE. Thus, results reveal that hybrid methods perform better than the single ones, also the effectiveness of the suggested method in reducing the prediction error and in achieving better RUL prediction performance compared to the other methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available