4.6 Article

Design, synthesis, in silico studies and in vitro evaluation of isatin-pyridine oximes hybrids as novel acetylcholinesterase reactivators

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENZYME INHIBITION AND MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 1370-1377

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2021.1916009

Keywords

Isatin; pyridine oximes; organophosphorus poisoning; cholinesterase reactivators; nerve agents; antidotes

Funding

  1. CNPq [308225/2018-0]
  2. FAPERJ [E-02/202.961/2017]
  3. OPCW Research Project Support Program [L/ICA/ICB/201062/15]
  4. UHK project [VT2019-2021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel isatin derivatives linked to a pyridinium 4-oxime moiety by an alkyl chain with improved calculated properties showed comparable in vitro reactivation against paraoxon- and NEMP-inhibited acetylcholinesterase, indicating their potential as promising compounds for tackling organophosphorus poisoning.
Organophosphorus poisoning caused by some pesticides and nerve agents is a life-threating condition that must be swiftly addressed to avoid casualties. Despite the availability of medical countermeasures, the clinically available compounds lack a broad spectrum, are not effective towards all organophosphorus toxins, and have poor pharmacokinetics properties to allow them crossing the blood-brain barrier, hampering cholinesterase reactivation at the central nervous system. In this work, we designed and synthesised novel isatin derivatives, linked to a pyridinium 4-oxime moiety by an alkyl chain with improved calculated properties, and tested their reactivation potency against paraoxon- and NEMP-inhibited acetylcholinesterase in comparison to the standard antidote pralidoxime. Our results showed that these compounds displayed comparable in vitro reactivation also pointed by the in silico studies, suggesting that they are promising compounds to tackle organophosphorus poisoning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available