4.0 Article

Expression patterns and prognostic significances of RRM1 and ERCC1 in pancreatic carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Journal

INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages 160-165

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_537_19

Keywords

Cholangiocarcinoma; excision repair cross-complementing gene-1; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; prognosis; Ribonucleotide Reductase Catalytic Subunit M1

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that RRM1 and ERCC1 expression levels were higher in pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma compared to controls, with statistically significant differences. However, no correlation was observed between low and high expression of RRM1 and ERCC1 with histological markers of prognosis and overall survival in these patients. This adds to the existing controversy regarding the prognostic significance of RRM1 and ERCC1 expression in pancreatic and biliary carcinomas, beyond their therapeutic benefits.
Background: Aggressive pancreatobiliary tumors often require oxaliplatin-based therapies, instead of standard gemcitabine-based therapy and biomarker studies at diagnosis to decide the appropriate therapeutic regimen. The ribonucleotide Reductase catalytic subunit M1 (RRM1) and excision repair cross-complementing gene-1 (ERCC1) are related to DNA synthesis and repair and essential in this regard. However, apart from the therapeutic benefit, their prognostic implication is controversial. Methods: In this retrospective study, paraffin-embedded tissue from 51 cases of pancreatic cancer and 29 cases of cholangiocarcinoma were evaluated for RRM1 and ERCC1 expression by immunohistochemical technique along with 18 control pancreatic and biliary tissues. The semiquantitatively H score was calculated based on stain distribution and stain intensities. Results: Both RRM1 and ERCC1 expression were high in tumor epithelium than in controls (RRM1: the difference was statistically significant in cholangiocarcinoma (P = 0.008); ERCC1: the difference was statistically significant both in pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma (P < 0.05)]. However, no correlation was noted between RRM1 and ERCC1-low and high tumors with histological markers of prognosis and overall survival in these patients. Conclusions: The present study adds further evidence against the controversy that if RRM1 and ERCC1 expression in pancreatic and biliary carcinomas have any prognostic significance apart from their proven therapeutic benefits in these tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available