4.3 Article

Occurrences of near-to-maximal speed-running bouts in elite soccer: insights for training prescription and injury mitigation

Journal

SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN FOOTBALL
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 105-110

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/24733938.2020.1802058

Keywords

Player monitoring; peak speed; sprinting; compensation; injury

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the occurrence of near-to-maximal speed-running bouts is low in elite soccer, with match context, playing position, and individual player profile being the main determinants of those occurrences.
Aim: To quantify the occurrence of near-to-maximal speed-running bouts in elite soccer players. Methods: Tracking match data from 35 professional players (23 +/- 3 yrs) were analysed over four seasons (2015-2019). The number of runs reaching >80, >85 and >90% of players' individual maximal sprinting speed (MSS) was computed. Differences in peak speed occurrences between halves and positions were analysed. Results: Occurrences were not different between halves, but slightly-to-moderately position-dependent, with wingers (3.5 +/- 2.0 runs >80% per half) and central midfielders (1.6 +/- 1.5 runs >80% per half) performing the most and the least number of near-to-maximal speed-running bouts. Players did not reach >90% of MSS at all in 35% (Attackers) to 65% (Midfielders) of their matches; they reached >= 3 times >90% MSS per match in 2% (Midfielders) to 11% (Attackers) of their matches only. The maximal number of cumulated match occurrences during congested periods was observed in acentral defender (2 runs >90% of MSS every 4 days for 31 days) and a winger (1 run every 4 days for 52 days). Conclusions: The occurrence of near-to-maximal speed-running bouts is low in elite soccer. Match context, playing position and individual player profile are the main determinants of those occurrences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available