4.7 Article

Generalized Cauchy Process: Difference Iterative Forecasting Model

Journal

FRACTAL AND FRACTIONAL
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fractalfract5020038

Keywords

generalized cauchy process; long-range dependent; difference iterative forecasting model; Hurst parameter; fractal dimension; wind speed forecasting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article develops a new stochastic sequence forecasting model, known as the difference iterative forecasting model based on the Generalized Cauchy (GC) process. The GC process, described by Hurst parameter H and fractal dimension D, is used to more flexibly describe various LRD processes. The forecasting model parameters are estimated by statistical methods and validated using real wind speed data.
The contribution of this article is mainly to develop a new stochastic sequence forecasting model, which is also called the difference iterative forecasting model based on the Generalized Cauchy (GC) process. The GC process is a Long-Range Dependent (LRD) process described by two independent parameters: Hurst parameter H and fractal dimension D. Compared with the fractional Brownian motion (fBm) with a linear relationship between H and D, the GC process can more flexibly describe various LRD processes. Before building the forecasting model, this article demonstrates the GC process using H and D to describe the LRD and fractal properties of stochastic sequences, respectively. The GC process is taken as the diffusion term to establish a differential iterative forecasting model, where the incremental distribution of the GC process is obtained by statistics. The parameters of the forecasting model are estimated by the box dimension, the rescaled range, and the maximum likelihood methods. Finally, a real wind speed data set is used to verify the performance of the GC difference iterative forecasting model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available