4.6 Article

Effect of surgical margin on postoperative prognosis in patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 12, Issue 15, Pages 4455-4462

Publisher

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/jca.57896

Keywords

surgical margin; postoperative prognosis; propensity score matching; hepatocellular carcinoma

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81660567, 81460516]
  2. Key Research and Development Project of Guangxi [AA18221001, AB18050020]
  3. Guangxi BaGui Scholars' Special Fund [2019AQ20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the effect of surgical margin (SM) on the postoperative prognosis of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using propensity score matching (PSM). The results showed that SM size did not affect prognosis for patients with negative SMs, while factors such as INR, AST, capsule integrity, microvascular invasion, tumour embolus, and tumour size were independent factors influencing postoperative prognosis for solitary HCC patients.
Objective: The effect of surgical margin (SM) on the postoperative prognosis of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of SM on the postoperative prognosis of patients with solitary HCC by using propensity score matching (PSM). Methods: Patients with solitary HCC who underwent liver resection were divided into a wide margin group (1.0 cm or more, group W) and a narrow margin group (< 1.0 cm, group N). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) associated with the SM status and the factors influencing postoperative prognosis were evaluated. Results: Before PSM, the indicators were not balanced between the two groups. PFS and OS were significantly lower in group N than group W. The factors affecting postoperative prognosis were international normalized ratio (INR), AST, capsule integrity, microvascular invasion, tumour embolus and tumour size. After PSM, data of both groups were balanced and comparable, and no significant differences in OS or PFS between the two groups. The INR in the above affecting factors was excluded. Conclusion: For solitary HCC patients with negative SMs, SM size does not affect prognosis. INR, AST, capsule integrity, microvascular invasion, tumour embolus and tumour size are independent factors influencing the postoperative prognosis of solitary HCC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available