4.4 Article

The Effect of Bottom Profile Dimples on the Femoral Head on Wear in Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jfb12020038

Keywords

total hip arthroplasty; contact pressure; wear; dimple; bottom profile

Funding

  1. Directorate of Research and Community Services, Republic of Indonesia [225-102/UN7.6.1/PP/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that adding dimples can reduce contact pressure and wear in total hip arthroplasty, with ball type dimples having the best ability to reduce wear compared to other types, reducing wear by 24.3% to 31% compared to no dimples. This indicates that surface texturing with appropriate dimple bottom geometry can extend the lifetime of hip implants.
Wear and wear-induced debris is a significant factor in causing failure in implants. Reducing contact pressure by using a textured surface between the femoral head and acetabular cup is crucial to improving the implant's life. This study presented the effect of surface texturing as dimples on the wear evolution of total hip arthroplasty. It was implemented by developing finite element analysis from the prediction model without dimples and with bottom profile dimples of flat, drill, and ball types. Simulations were carried out by performing 3D physiological loading of the hip joint under normal walking conditions. A geometry update was initiated based on the patient's daily routine activities. Our results showed that the addition of dimples reduced contact pressure and wear. The bottom profile dimples of the ball type had the best ability to reduce wear relative to the other types, reducing cumulative linear wear by 24.3% and cumulative volumetric wear by 31% compared to no dimples. The findings demonstrated that surface texturing with appropriate dimple bottom geometry on a bearing surface is able to extend the lifetime of hip implants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available