Journal
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
Volume 147, Issue 5S, Pages 31S-38SPublisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008043
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The authors reviewed 31 studies and concluded that no different surgical approaches should be adopted for revision surgery following implant-based breast surgery in patients with textured devices, as long as a correct approach is performed to face complications or adverse events, following a thorough preoperative study of the patient with the proper diagnostic tools.
The authors reviewed the available evidence on revision surgery following implant-based breast surgery with the aim of investigating whether any difference in the surgical approach should be proposed if the patient has a textured device. They included in their review 31 studies presenting different approaches for revision surgery following implant-based breast surgery (both aesthetic and reconstructive), with a level of evidence ranging from 4 to 5. None of the included studies proposed different surgical approaches for revision surgery in patients carrying textured devices. The authors conclude that no different surgical attitudes in revision surgery following implant-based breast surgery should be adopted if the patient has a textured device according to the available evidence, when a correct approach is performed to face the complication or adverse event, following a thorough preoperative study of the patient with the proper diagnostic tools.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available