4.1 Article

ASSESSING NITROGEN NUTRITIONAL STATUS, BIOMASS AND YIELD OF COTTON WITH NDVI, SPAD AND PETIOLE SAP NITRATE CONCENTRATION

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 531-548

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0014479717000229

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Canopy normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), soil plant analysis development (SPAD) reading and petiole sap NO3--N concentration are increasingly used as quick and non-destructive methods to monitor plant N nutrition and growth status and predict yield of crops. However, little information is available on the comparisons of these three methods in assessing N nutrition, growth and yield for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Four N rates (0, 34, 67 and 101 kg N ha(-1)) under two cover conditions [no cover crop and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) crop] in a 33-year long-term field trial were used to evaluate how canopy NDVI, SPAD reading (related to chlorophyll content) and petiole sap NO3--N concentration (conventional method) are able to assess N nutrition and plant biomass and predict yield for cotton. Canopy NDVI and SPAD readings responded less sensitively to N rates than petiole sap NO3--N. The responses of NDVI and SPAD reading to N rates were generally reduced due to the winter cover crop with hairy vetch. Significant and positive correlations existed mostly among NDVI, SPAD reading, and petiole sap NO3--N concentration. Canopy NDVI during mid-bloom to late bloom and SPAD reading during early bloom to late bloom were effective alternative methods for assessing cotton N nutrition status. The SPAD reading at late bloom was an effective parameter to estimate cotton biomass. The NDVI at early square and SPAD reading during early square to mid-bloom were effective for cotton yield prediction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available