4.5 Article

Effect of Biomass-Burning Emissions on Soil Water Repellency: A Pilot Laboratory Study

Journal

FIRE-SWITZERLAND
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fire4020024

Keywords

soil; fire-induced soil water repellency (FISWR); silica sand; combustion chamber; biomass-burning emissions; Jeffrey pine duff; soil organic matter (SOM); water drop penetration time (WDPT); contact angle; sorptivity

Funding

  1. Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AGS-1544425, IIA-1301726, EAR-1324894]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the water repellency of sand exposed to smoke and heat or fulvic acid, showing severe to extreme water repellency in treated samples. It indicates that water infiltration into treated sand is significantly lower compared to untreated sand.
While western U.S. wildfires have increased in intensity and scale, their impacts on soil chemical composition and hydraulic processes have received little attention, despite increasing erosion, surface runoff and flooding. The relationships between biomass-burning emissions, composition of the soil, fire heat, and soil water repellency are fragmental and sometimes contradictory. Here, we characterized the water repellency of sand (soil surrogate) exposed to Jeffrey pine duff smoke under controlled laboratory conditions. Water drop penetration time (WDPT), effective contact angle, and relative sorptivity of exposed silica sand (soil surrogate) were determined. Sand samples treated with smoke and heat or with cold smoke showed severe-to-extreme water repellency (WDPT > 1020 s). Sand samples exposed to fulvic acid (surrogate for soil organic matter) showed strong water repellency (WDPT = 81 s) that increased to become severe (WDPT = 2305 s) after subsequent heating to 200 degrees C for two hours. All sand samples exposed to either fire emissions or fulvic acid showed WDPTs >81 s, effective contact angles between 78 degrees and 87 degrees, and relative sorptivities between 0.31 and 0.49 compared with the untreated sand samples, with a WDPT <0.5 s, effective contact angle of 48 degrees, and relative sorptivity of 1. This indicates that the sorptivity-controlled water infiltration into treated sand is less than half of that into untreated sand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available