4.5 Article

Visualizing the autonomous vehicle's maneuvers-Does an ecological interface help to increase the hedonic quality and safety?

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.005

Keywords

Autonomous driving; Safety; Driver behavior; Intelligent vehicle systems; Smart; Vehicles; Ecological interface design

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [227198829/GRK1931]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper investigates whether ecological speed information during automated driving can improve hedonic quality and driving safety during a driving takeover. The study involved 43 drivers in a dynamic driving simulator experiment comparing ecological and conventional interfaces for presenting speed changes. The results show that the ecological interface did not differ from the conventional interface in terms of hedonic quality, but significantly improved lateral control and early use of vehicle mirrors after takeover, potentially helping drivers cope with sudden takeovers in a faster and more controlled manner.
This paper examines whether ecological speed information describing ongoing driving maneuvers during automated driving enhances the hedonic quality and driving safety immediately after a driving takeover. Visualizing maneuvers and trajectories has already proven effective. However, planned acceleration and deceleration in an automated vehicle have not yet been investigated. Therefore, this paper assesses how an automated vehicle's speed control information might be presented by an ecological interface. Besides a possible increase in the hedonic quality, this information might enhance safe behavior of the human driver when it comes to a takeover. To assess these two aspects, 43 drivers participated in a dynamic driving simulator study. Using a within-subject design, two scenarios were used to compare an ecological interface, dynamically visualizing speed changes, to a conventional pop-up interface, using pop-up icons to visualize speed changes. The experimental results indicate that ecological feedback and conventional pop-up feedback do not differ regarding the hedonic quality, which was reflected by the state anxiety, usefulness, and satisfaction with the overall human-machine interface (HMI). Nonetheless, the post-hoc questionnaire on situational awareness showed a significantly lower rating for the ecological interface which may be the result of a more automatic and subconscious processing of the information given. Analyzing the takeover performance, the initial takeover time was comparably low for both interfaces. However, concerning safety, the ecological interface significantly enhanced the lateral control after takeover, and the drivers looked at the vehicle mirrors significantly earlier. In conclusion, the results show that the information given by the ecological interface may help drivers cope with a sudden takeover in a faster and more controlled way. Future applications of these findings might serve to enhance the acceptance and safety of semi-autonomous vehicles by implementing ecological interfaces. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available