4.7 Article

Hunting for top partner with a new signature at the LHC

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 103, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.115017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [11947118, 11705093]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the discovery potential of a new signal from top partner decays at the LHC using classical machine learning methods. Results show that the future high-luminosity LHC can exclude top partner masses up to the TeV scale, and single production processes may outperform pair production processes at the 14 TeV LHC if the top partner is heavy.
A vector-like top partner plays a central role in many new physics models that attempt to address the hierarchy problem. The top partner is conventionally assumed to decay to a quark and a Standard Model (SM) boson. However, it is also possible that the top partner decays to a non-SM scalar and a top quark. Such an exotic decay channel can be the main decay channel of top partners, and thus provides new windows to search for top partners at the LHC. In this paper, with the classical machine learning method of boosted decision trees, we perform a model-independent study of the discovery potential of this new signature at the LHC. In order to suppress the main QCD background, we consider the subdominant but clean decay channel a -> gamma gamma. For completeness, the single production process and pair production process of top partners are taken into account. We find that, for both single and pair production, the future high-luminosity LHC can exclude a top partner mass up to the TeV scale through the channel T -> ta (a -> gamma gamma), even if BR(a -> gamma gamma) is as small as O(0.1%). Besides, our result shows that single production can overmatch pair production at the 14 TeV LHC, provided that the top partner is heavier than 800-900 GeV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available